Last night's primary elections resulted in victories for Senator Santorum in North Dakota, Tennessee and Oklahoma whilst Mitt Romney won Virginia, Vermont, Massachusetts and Ohio. Not to worry though, his narrow win in The Buckeye State doesn't really change anything as the delegates are distributed proportionally and there's a good chance Santorum will get the same amount of delegates as Romney. Meanwhile, Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich won his home state of Georgia - making his count of states carried a meager two. The only candidate not to win any state last night was Ron Paul, who is yet to carry a single state in these Primaries.
What Gingrich and Paul are essentially doing, especially Gingrich, is splitting the Conservative vote - increasing Romney's chances of winning the nomination at the National Convention this summer. Although Gingrich isn't exactly scoring big numbers - the delegates he will be appointed through Georgia would be a much-needed addition to Senator Santorum's delegate count, a candidate who actually still has a shot at the nomination. It is now becoming increasingly clear that it's all down to Santorum v. Romney and that the other two candidates have virtually no chance - so why prevent the only real Conservative candidate who has a shot at the nomination from winning the Primaries? Although Gingrich won South Carolina and Georgia and might win some delegates in Alabama and Mississippi, he is way too far behind in both delegate count and polls to have the slighest chance of neither winning the nomination nor winning the Presidential Election.
So, Newt, please drop out - cause you ain't got no chance anyhow. Move over and make room for someone who actually has a fair chance of winning - Senator Santorum. If Newt was really true to his Conservative conviction, he'd realize that only Santorum has any chance whatsoever to stop the flip-flopping millionaire bandwagon that is Mitt Romney.
Hang in there Santorum and go win the Yellowhammer and the Magnolia State!
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Santorum Projected to Win Michigan and Arizona
Conservative front-runner Rick Santorum looks as if though he's going to win yet another two states next week; Arizona and Michigan. Despite Michigan's reputation as a stronghold for moderates and liberals - recent polls show former Pennsylvanian senator at 39% to Romney's 24%. In Arizona - the polls have Santorum tied to Romney within the margin of error. This is great news for Conservatives everywhere and clear proof that Rick has the support of the American people that it takes to win the Presidential Election.
I believe that to win as a Republican, you can't run on a moderate or semi-liberal platform - as McCain demonstrated. One must stand out from the Democrats and show the boldness and innovative solutions which convince the American people. Rick Santorum is the personification of bold Conservatism and good old-fashioned American, Christian and family-based values and therefore - he will win.
Despite many claims that he's out of touch with the black demographic, one must remember that blacks are among the most socially Conservative out of all demographics. Whilst Obama may win the black vote thanks to his race - I am convinced that many will see sense and vote for a man who shares their values of social Conservatism. Take a look at this video below and see how conservative many blacks really are, despite voting for Obama.
I believe that to win as a Republican, you can't run on a moderate or semi-liberal platform - as McCain demonstrated. One must stand out from the Democrats and show the boldness and innovative solutions which convince the American people. Rick Santorum is the personification of bold Conservatism and good old-fashioned American, Christian and family-based values and therefore - he will win.
Despite many claims that he's out of touch with the black demographic, one must remember that blacks are among the most socially Conservative out of all demographics. Whilst Obama may win the black vote thanks to his race - I am convinced that many will see sense and vote for a man who shares their values of social Conservatism. Take a look at this video below and see how conservative many blacks really are, despite voting for Obama.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Overturn Roe v Wade Now
Before the Supreme Court's decision on Roe v Wade in 1973, abortion was only legal on request in 4 states out 50 (New York, Washington, Hawaii and Alaska). Out of the remaining 46, abortion was illegal on all grounds in 30 states, legal only in the case of rape in 1 state (Mississippi), legal only in case of danger to woman's health (Massachusetts and Alabama) and legal in case of danger to woman's health, rape, incest or likely damaged fetus in 13 states.
Whilst I think it's a great shame that not all states were like the 30 ones that appear red on the map, at least the states that didn't feel like legalizing murder of the unborn was the right thing to do could illegalize there. However, the Supreme Court felt that all states should legalize the murder of the unborn on privacy grounds. Now, personally, I believe that the state's role of protecting all innocent lives from the malicious intent of others comes before letting women abort their babies because they might 'be an inconvenient addition to their lives'. Another upsetting thing about the verdict, if one looks past the sheer violation of the infants' right to life, is the clear disregard for the will of the American people as demonstrated below:
"Currently, 54% of Americans oppose either all abortions or all but "the exception" (rape, incest and mother's life). 39% agreed that abortion should only be legal in instances of rape, incest or prevent the death of the mother. Only 16% thought abortion should be illegal in all circumstances. Conversely, just 42% generally support abortion (26% saying it should always be legal with another 16% saying it should be legal in most circumstances)." ~Texas Right to Life on a 2005 poll by Gallup.
And this goes for all of the United States, including the neoliberals of the Northeast and the Northwest, and would almost certainly show even larger numbers opposing abortion if conducted only in the South. If one believes in states' right, surely one must think it's the states' right to outlaw abortion, regardless of the Supreme Court's very questionable ruling on Roe v Wade. And if one doesn't, surely one must at least think that the will of the people should matter more than the will of the Supreme Court.
There are those who say "Why do you care? It's not your baby, let them have abortions if they wish" and to these extremely irresponsible persons I have the following to say: Let's say Person A goes out to murder Person B. You've never met either one or have even heard of them, yet you probably think that Person A is guilty of a horrendous crime that should not be legal, right? Why should different rules apply to the situation if Person B happens to be unborn? Life begins at conception and is God's most wonderful gift and the taking of an innocent life should be outlawed and swiftly punished. How can one justify the convencience of the mother outweighing the right to life of the infant? One cannot, because it is utterly insane!
The right to life is stated explicitly in the United States Constitution; let's honor it and overturn Roe v Wade! Since Obama and the rest of the Democrats won't do it, vote for Rick Santorum - a man committed to innocent lives' right not to be taken and the values that made America great.
Whilst I think it's a great shame that not all states were like the 30 ones that appear red on the map, at least the states that didn't feel like legalizing murder of the unborn was the right thing to do could illegalize there. However, the Supreme Court felt that all states should legalize the murder of the unborn on privacy grounds. Now, personally, I believe that the state's role of protecting all innocent lives from the malicious intent of others comes before letting women abort their babies because they might 'be an inconvenient addition to their lives'. Another upsetting thing about the verdict, if one looks past the sheer violation of the infants' right to life, is the clear disregard for the will of the American people as demonstrated below:
"Currently, 54% of Americans oppose either all abortions or all but "the exception" (rape, incest and mother's life). 39% agreed that abortion should only be legal in instances of rape, incest or prevent the death of the mother. Only 16% thought abortion should be illegal in all circumstances. Conversely, just 42% generally support abortion (26% saying it should always be legal with another 16% saying it should be legal in most circumstances)." ~Texas Right to Life on a 2005 poll by Gallup.
And this goes for all of the United States, including the neoliberals of the Northeast and the Northwest, and would almost certainly show even larger numbers opposing abortion if conducted only in the South. If one believes in states' right, surely one must think it's the states' right to outlaw abortion, regardless of the Supreme Court's very questionable ruling on Roe v Wade. And if one doesn't, surely one must at least think that the will of the people should matter more than the will of the Supreme Court.
There are those who say "Why do you care? It's not your baby, let them have abortions if they wish" and to these extremely irresponsible persons I have the following to say: Let's say Person A goes out to murder Person B. You've never met either one or have even heard of them, yet you probably think that Person A is guilty of a horrendous crime that should not be legal, right? Why should different rules apply to the situation if Person B happens to be unborn? Life begins at conception and is God's most wonderful gift and the taking of an innocent life should be outlawed and swiftly punished. How can one justify the convencience of the mother outweighing the right to life of the infant? One cannot, because it is utterly insane!
The right to life is stated explicitly in the United States Constitution; let's honor it and overturn Roe v Wade! Since Obama and the rest of the Democrats won't do it, vote for Rick Santorum - a man committed to innocent lives' right not to be taken and the values that made America great.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Santorum Sweeps Across the Country
Last night, Rick Santorum won the primaries in all three states hosting such: Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado - showing Americans that he is far from out of the race and has a real chance of winning the nomination. These are some very welcome news, folks and a victory for Conservatives all over the country to see a true Conservative Christian win these states, including traditionally left-leaning Minnesota and Colorado. And he didn't just barely win neither, in Colorado Santorum got 40% to Romney's 35%, in Minnesota Santorum got 45% to Paul's 27% and in Missouri Senator Santorum scored an impressive 55%!
It would appear that Romney just got some competition, especially after the plunge in Gingrich's numbers after his insane statements such as the planning of a permanent settlement on the moon [sic] which would eventually become a state.
Let's pray that this keeps up and that Santorum wins the Republican nomination because America's had it with moderates and left-leaning liberals and I am confident that Santorum will prove once and for all that we don't have to settle with moderates who are so afraid as to offend anyone that they won't stand up for anything!
Now let's move on to Arizona and Michigan and let's win this thing for America!
It would appear that Romney just got some competition, especially after the plunge in Gingrich's numbers after his insane statements such as the planning of a permanent settlement on the moon [sic] which would eventually become a state.
Let's pray that this keeps up and that Santorum wins the Republican nomination because America's had it with moderates and left-leaning liberals and I am confident that Santorum will prove once and for all that we don't have to settle with moderates who are so afraid as to offend anyone that they won't stand up for anything!
Now let's move on to Arizona and Michigan and let's win this thing for America!
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Why Rick Santorum Should be President
Richard John "Rick" Santorum, Pennsylvania Senator (1995-2007) and U.S. Representative (R-PA) (1991-1995), is perhaps the best suited man of all those who are currently running to become President of the United States. This great, family-oriented father of seven has proven to be a man of great morals and of strong Christian and American values - the kind of values which made America great. This man valiantly defends the lives of the innocent unborn and the sacred union which is marriage when others bow to the liberal agenda of anti-Christian and anti-tradionalist beliefs.
Rick Santorum voted for tax cuts during his tenure as Senator because he believes in the American Dream and he knows how it can be available for more people. Because Rick Santorum knows very well what economic freedom and liberty can help create and Rick's grandfather who emigrated from Italy knows very well what the economic opression of social-liberalism and high taxes does to a man, his country and his family. Rick Santorum is a champion of the values that made America great in the 20th century. Free-market capitalism and low taxes.
Now, you may say "Doesn't Ron Paul want to lower the taxes too? Why shouldn't we vote for that guy instead?" when you read this. Sure, Paul wants to lower the taxes as well - as do most Republicans and those few Democrats who see at the very least fiscal sense. However, is a man who opposes the death-penalty and believes that states should legalize marijuana and gay marriage if they wish the right man to lead a country that was made great through Christian values, integrity and morality and which truly is God's chosen country?
He is not. This man will only lead us to damnation and increasing secularism and decreasing the effect of Christian morals and values in our society, ultimately leading to the social liberalism and contempt for one's past and heritage that has so ferociously swept across Europe and even Canada.
The United States of America is an exceptional nation in many regards and it remains a lone bastion of old-time values of integrity and morals and respect and cherishing of our Christian heritage in today's increasingly secular and anti-Christian left-leaning West. We will not, I repeat not, bow to this unholy left-wing agenda that will ultimately destroy the United States as we know it we do not stop it! This is America, land of the free and home of the brave, and it shall remain so for many, many years to come.
If you love America, support Rick Santorum's run for the Presidency and help restore our bleeding nation!
God Bless America and God Bless the great man which is Rick Santorum!
Rick Santorum voted for tax cuts during his tenure as Senator because he believes in the American Dream and he knows how it can be available for more people. Because Rick Santorum knows very well what economic freedom and liberty can help create and Rick's grandfather who emigrated from Italy knows very well what the economic opression of social-liberalism and high taxes does to a man, his country and his family. Rick Santorum is a champion of the values that made America great in the 20th century. Free-market capitalism and low taxes.
Now, you may say "Doesn't Ron Paul want to lower the taxes too? Why shouldn't we vote for that guy instead?" when you read this. Sure, Paul wants to lower the taxes as well - as do most Republicans and those few Democrats who see at the very least fiscal sense. However, is a man who opposes the death-penalty and believes that states should legalize marijuana and gay marriage if they wish the right man to lead a country that was made great through Christian values, integrity and morality and which truly is God's chosen country?
He is not. This man will only lead us to damnation and increasing secularism and decreasing the effect of Christian morals and values in our society, ultimately leading to the social liberalism and contempt for one's past and heritage that has so ferociously swept across Europe and even Canada.
The United States of America is an exceptional nation in many regards and it remains a lone bastion of old-time values of integrity and morals and respect and cherishing of our Christian heritage in today's increasingly secular and anti-Christian left-leaning West. We will not, I repeat not, bow to this unholy left-wing agenda that will ultimately destroy the United States as we know it we do not stop it! This is America, land of the free and home of the brave, and it shall remain so for many, many years to come.
If you love America, support Rick Santorum's run for the Presidency and help restore our bleeding nation!
God Bless America and God Bless the great man which is Rick Santorum!
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Arrest Obama!
Barack Obama, 44th and Current President of the United States, was allegedly born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961 and is therefore considered to be a 'Natural-born citizen of the United States'. However, whilst his mother was from Kansas and a United States citizen, his father was Kenyan and never even acquired a permanent visa.
If we then take a look at The Law of Nations (used by Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and those other blokes we like to call our Founding Fathers) we clearly see that it states "natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens" in Volume 9, Chapter 19, Section 212. Therefore, we can easily confirm that Barack Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and therefore ineligble as President.
And this is just all assuming that he actually was born in Hawaii, disregarding the fact that Obama's SSN is that belonging to people from Connecticut, not from Hawaii where Obama resided when his number was issued in 1977. This casts serious doubt upon the authenticity of the papers Barack Obama released to prove that he was in fact born in the U.S. For there is no reason whatsoever as to why Obama would have the 042 prefix that was Connecticut's when he has never lived in the Connecticut and surely did not do so when he was 15 and the SSN was issued.
Currently, the eligibility of Barack Obama is being debated in Georgia where - if ruled ineligble by the court - his name would be taken off the George Presidential Election ballot and leave the Democratic Party with zero chance of winning Georgia.
With all that being said, I believe that Barack Obama should be arrested on suspicion of fraud and the Presidency be filled by Joe Biden, current Vice President.
Contact your Congressman today and ask him or her to raise this question in Congress as soon as possible!
If we then take a look at The Law of Nations (used by Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and those other blokes we like to call our Founding Fathers) we clearly see that it states "natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens" in Volume 9, Chapter 19, Section 212. Therefore, we can easily confirm that Barack Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and therefore ineligble as President.
And this is just all assuming that he actually was born in Hawaii, disregarding the fact that Obama's SSN is that belonging to people from Connecticut, not from Hawaii where Obama resided when his number was issued in 1977. This casts serious doubt upon the authenticity of the papers Barack Obama released to prove that he was in fact born in the U.S. For there is no reason whatsoever as to why Obama would have the 042 prefix that was Connecticut's when he has never lived in the Connecticut and surely did not do so when he was 15 and the SSN was issued.
Currently, the eligibility of Barack Obama is being debated in Georgia where - if ruled ineligble by the court - his name would be taken off the George Presidential Election ballot and leave the Democratic Party with zero chance of winning Georgia.
With all that being said, I believe that Barack Obama should be arrested on suspicion of fraud and the Presidency be filled by Joe Biden, current Vice President.
Contact your Congressman today and ask him or her to raise this question in Congress as soon as possible!
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Mayor of East Haven, CT Accused of Making Racist Remarks
The Mayor of East Haven, Connecticut Joseph A. Maturo (R) is facing a public backlash for the comments he made after four officers of the East Haven Police were charged for using excessive force against undocumented Hispanic immigrants.
When asked by a WPIX reporter "What are you going to do for the Latino community today?" Mayor Maturo responded "I might have tacos when I go home, I'm not quite sure yet". The reporter then said "You realize that isn't the comment to say right now, right?" to which the Mayor replied "When you ask me what I could do for Latinos, I may go out and have a Latino dinner in the Latino community. There's nothing wrong with that and you can twist it and turn it in whichever way the press decides to do".
Now, this is yet another example of how the press will make anything out to be racist. Hell, you can't even describe the physical appearance of an individual without someone calling it racist these days. The definition of racism is to consider a certain race or ethnic group to have a higher human value than others and this is clearly not the case with this Republican Constitution State city mayor's comments.
In what Universe does saying that one might have some tacos later on equal considering that all Hispanics have a lesser human value than other Americans? In mine, it sure doesn't. This hard-working, all-American mayor just told a reporter of his dinner plans, which actually would help the Latino community as it would bring increased revenue to a Hispanic-American restaurant owner somewhere in East Haven.
Now, the comments Mayor Maturo made were perhaps not the best but they sure weren't racist or derogatory in any way and I am sorry for Joseph Maturo - having to face these allegations of him being racist just because he talked about tacos.
When asked by a WPIX reporter "What are you going to do for the Latino community today?" Mayor Maturo responded "I might have tacos when I go home, I'm not quite sure yet". The reporter then said "You realize that isn't the comment to say right now, right?" to which the Mayor replied "When you ask me what I could do for Latinos, I may go out and have a Latino dinner in the Latino community. There's nothing wrong with that and you can twist it and turn it in whichever way the press decides to do".
Now, this is yet another example of how the press will make anything out to be racist. Hell, you can't even describe the physical appearance of an individual without someone calling it racist these days. The definition of racism is to consider a certain race or ethnic group to have a higher human value than others and this is clearly not the case with this Republican Constitution State city mayor's comments.
In what Universe does saying that one might have some tacos later on equal considering that all Hispanics have a lesser human value than other Americans? In mine, it sure doesn't. This hard-working, all-American mayor just told a reporter of his dinner plans, which actually would help the Latino community as it would bring increased revenue to a Hispanic-American restaurant owner somewhere in East Haven.
Now, the comments Mayor Maturo made were perhaps not the best but they sure weren't racist or derogatory in any way and I am sorry for Joseph Maturo - having to face these allegations of him being racist just because he talked about tacos.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Jo Bonner (R-AL) Under Fire for the RESTORE Act
Challengers to Alabamian Republican Congressman Jo Bonner (Alabama's 1st Congressional District) are attacking him over the RESTORE Act, which would send the BP oil spill fine money to the state governments of the affected states, rather than to the individuals who were affected by the oil spill. This is essentially another move by the Mobilian Congressman to increase the Governments' role in its citizens lives. This can only mean trouble for the poor people who had their lives disrupted and destroyed by the oil spill as they have to deal with the bureaucracy of the state governments to restore their lives.
I'd like to quote Republican Congressional hopeful Peter Gounares who said "I can't think of a time in history where giving a bunch of money to the government ... has ever been a good idea". There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to enlarge the government and its role rather than hand the money out to the individuals who were directly affected, which could potentially create a local economic boom in the Gulf area. I believe in an America where individuals are trusted to take responsibility for themselves and where the responsibility isn't outsourced to a couple of local officials who can not possibly know what kind of problems each individual person affected by this is facing.
Let these people decide their own fate and their own future and leave them in control of their own lives, for that is what America is all about. Personal freedom and the liberty to decide your own fate. I am not to tell anyone else how they best resolve their own problems and restore their lives and property and neither is the government, neither Federal nor Local.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Romney Super-PAC Attacks Santorum
This ad started airing a while back in Florida, one of few ads attacking ex-Senator Rick Santorum who comes in third in the Florida polls. Does Romney know Santorum has something up his sleeve or is he just trying to widen the gap? I believe voters giving up on Santorum are very unlikely to go vote for liberal Romney, instead they'd probably turn to Gingrich - which does not benefit Romney in any way. If I ran the Romney Super-PAC, I'd run as many anti-Gingrich ads as I could, because he's the real threat to Romney in Florida - not Santorum. What would benefit Romney the most would probably be Conservatives splitting their votes between Gingrich and Santorum instead of all rallying up behind Newt.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)